Due Thursday, January 30
This lab will require you to load, clean, and analyze a new dataset. Specifically, this lab utilizes the “ames.csv” data (found here). This is a famous dataset about home sales from Ames, Iowa.
You have been recently hired to Zillow’s Zestimate product team as a junior analyst. As a part of their regular hazing, they have given you access to a small subset of their historic sales data. Your job is to present some basic predictions for housing values in a small geographic area (Ames, IA) using this historical pricing.
First, let's load the data.
ameslist <- read.table("https://msudataanalytics.github.io/SSC442/Labs/data/ames.csv", header = TRUE, sep = ",")
Before we proceed, let's note a few things about the (simple) code above. First, we have specified
header = TRUE because---you guessed it---the original dataset has headers. Although simple, this is an incredibly important step because it allows
R to do some smart
R things. Specifically, once the headers are in, the variables are formatted as
factor where appropriate. It is absolutely vital that we format the data correctly; otherwise, many
R commands will whine at us.
Try it: Run the above, but instead specifying
header = FALSE. What data type are the various columns? Now try ommitting the line altogether. What is the default behavior of the
We are not going to tell you anything about this data. This is intended to replicate a real-world experience that you will all encounter in the (possibly near) future: someone hands you data and you're expected to make sense of it. Fortunately for us, this data is (somewhat) self-contained. We'll first check the variable names to try to divine some information. Recall, we have a handy little function for that:
Note that, when doing data exploration, we will sometimes choose to not save our output. This is a judgement call; here we've chosen to merely inspect the variables rather than diving in.
Inspection yields some obvious truths. For example:
||Unique identifier for each row||
||Size of lot (units unknown)||
||Sale price of house ($)||
...but we face some not-so-obvious things as well. For example:
||? Something about the lot||
||? No clue at all||
||? Seems like street info||
It will be difficult to learn anything about the data that is of type
int without outside documentation. However, we can learn something more about the
factor-type variables. In order to understand these a little better, we need to review some of the values that each take on.
Try it: Go through the variables in the dataset and make a note about your interpretation for each. Many will be obvious, but some require additional thought.
We now turn to another central issue---and one that explains our nomenclature choice thus far: the data object is of type
list. To verify this for yourself, check:
This isn't ideal---for some visualization packages, for instance, we need data frames and not lists. We'll make a mental note of this as something to potentially clean up if we desire.
Although there are some variables that would be difficult to clean, there are a few that we can address with relative ease. Consider, for instance, the variable
GarageType. This might not be that important, but, remember, the weather in Ames, IA is pretty crummy---a detached garage might be a dealbreaker for some would-be homebuyers. Let's inspect the values:
> unique(ameslist$GarageType)  Attchd Detchd BuiltIn CarPort <NA> Basment 2Types
With this, we could make an informed decision and create a new variable. Let's create
OutdoorGarage to indicate, say, homes that have any type of garage that requires the homeowner to walk outdoors after parking their car. (For those who aren't familiar with different garage types, a car port is not insulated and is therefore considered outdoors. A detached garage presumably requires that the person walks outside after parking. The three other types are inside the main structure, and
2Types we can assume includes at least one attached garage of some sort). This is going to require a bit more coding and we will have to think through each step carefully.
First, let's create a new object that has indicator variables (that is, a variable whose values are either zero or one) for each of the
GarageType values. As with everything in
R, there's a handy function to do this for us:
GarageTemp = model.matrix( ~ GarageType - 1, data=ameslist$GarageType )
We now have two separate objects living in our computer's memory:
GarageTemp---so named to indicate that it is a temporary object. We now need to stitch it back onto our original data; we'll use a simple concatenation and write over our old list with the new one:
ameslist <- cbind(ameslist, GarageTemp) > Error in data.frame(..., check.names = FALSE) : arguments imply differing number of rows: 1460, 1379
Huh. What's going on?
Try it: Figure out what's going on above. Fix this code so that you have a working version.
Now that we've got that working (ha!) we can generate a new variable for our outdoor garage. We'll use a somewhat gross version below because it is verbose; that said, this can be easily accomplished using logical indexing for those who like that approach.
ameslist$GarageOutside <- ifelse(ameslist$GarageTypeDetchd == 1 | ameslist$GarageTypeCarPort == 1, 1, 0) unique(ameslist$GarageOutside)  0 1 NA
This seems to have worked. The command above
ifelse() does what it says:
if some condition is met (here, either of two variables equals one) then it returns a one;
else it returns a zero. Such functions are very handy, though as mentioned above, there are other ways of doing this. Also note, that while fixed the issue with
NA above, we've got new issues: we definitely don't want
NA outputted from this operation. Accordingly, we're going to need to deal with it somehow.
Try it: Utilizing a similar approach to what you did above, fix this so that the only outputs are zero and one.
Generally speaking, this is a persistent issue, and you will spend an extraordinary amount of time dealing with missing data or data that does not encode a variable exactly as you want it. This is expecially true if you deal with real-world data: you will need to learn how to handle
NAs. There are a number of fixes (as always, Google is your friend) and anything that works is good. But you should spend some time thinking about this and learning at least one approach.
Prune the data to all of the variables that are
type = int about which you have some reasonable intuition for what they mean. This must include the variable
SalePrice. Save this new dataset as
Ames. Produce documentation for this object in the form of a .txt file. This must describe each of the preserved variables, the values it can take (e.g., can it be negative?) and your interpretation of the variable.
Produce a scatterplot matrix which includes 12 of the variables that are
type = int in the data set. Choose those that you believe are likely to be correlated with
Compute a matrix of correlations between these variables using the function
cor(). Does this match your prior beliefs? Briefly discuss the correlation between the miscellaneous variables and
Produce a scatterplot between
GrLivArea. Use the
abline() function to plot the relationship that you've found in the simple linear regression.
(Bonus; more challenging) Create a visualization that shows the proliferation of air conditioning in homes in Ames.
We're now ready to start playing with a model. We will start by using the
lm() function to fit a simple linear regression
SalePrice as the response and lstat as the predictor.
Recall that the basic
lm() syntax is
y is the response,
x is the predictor, and
data is the data set in which these two variables are kept. Let's quickly run this with two variables:
lm.fit = lm(SalePrice ~ GrLivArea)
Error in eval(expr, envir, enclos) : Object "SalePrice" not found
This command causes an error because
R does not know where to find the variables. We can fix this by attaching the data:
attach(Ames) lm.fit = lm(SalePrice ~ GrLivArea)
Try it: What is
GrLivArea? If you did not include this variable above, check its relationship to other variables in the dataset to get a better idea what it is.
The next line tells
R that the variables are in the object known as
Ames. If you haven't created this object yet (as in Exercise 1) you'll get an error at this stage. But once we attach
Ames, the first line works fine because
R now recognizes the variables. Alternatively, we could specify this within the
lm() call using
data = Ames. We've presented this way because it may be new to you; choose whichever you find most reasonable.
If we type
lm.fit, some basic information about the model is output. For more detailed information, we use
summary(lm.fit). This gives us p-values and standard errors for the coefficients, as well as the statistic and -statistic for the entire model.
Utilizing these functions hels us see some interesting results. Note that we built (nearly) the simplest possible model:
But even on its own, this model is instructive. It suggest that an increase in overall living area of 1 ft is correlated with an expected increase in sales price of $107. (Note that we cannot make causal claims!)
Saving the model as we did above is useful because we can explore other pieces of information it stores. Specifically, we can use the
names() function in order to find out what else is stored in
lm.fit. Although we can extract these quan- tities by name---e.g.
lm.fit$coefficients---it is safer to use the extractor functions like
coef() to access them. We can also use a handy tool like
plot() applied directly to
lm.fit to see some interesting data that is automatically stored by the model.
Try it: Use
plot() to explore the model above. Do you suspect that some outliers have a large influence on the data? We will explore this point specifically in the future.
We can now go crazy adding variables to our model. It's as simple as appending them to the previous code---though you should be careful executing this, as it will overwrite your previous output:
lm.fit = lm(SalePrice ~ GrLivArea + LotArea)
Try it: Does controlling for
LotArea change the qualitative conclusions from the previous regression? What about the quantitative results? Does the direction of the change in the quantitative results make sense to you?
lm() function in a simple linear regression (e.g., with only one predictor) with
SalePrice as the response to determine the value of an indoor garage.
lm() function to perform a multiple linear regression with
SalePrice as the response and all other variables from your
Ames data as the predictors. Use the
summary() function to print the results. Comment on the output. For instance:
plot() function applied to your model to produce diagnostic plots of the linear regression fit. Comment on any problems you see with the fit. Do the residual plots suggest any unusually large outliers? Does the leverage plot identify any observations with unusually high leverage?
: symbols to fit linear regression models with some well-chosen interaction effects. Do any interactions appear to be statistically significant?
Try a few (e.g., three) different transformations of the variables, such as , , . Do any of these make sense to include in a model of
SalePrice? Comment on your findings.
(Bonus; very very challenging) How might we build a model to estimate the elasticity of demand from this dataset?
Of course, you could find out the defaults of the function by simply using the handy
? command. Don't forget about this tool! ↩︎
It's not exactly true that these objects are in memory. They are... sort of. But how
R handles memory is complicated and silly and blah blah who cares. It's basically in memory. ↩︎
If you are not familiar with this type of visualization, consult the course textbook (ISL), Chapters 2 and 3. ↩︎
When we use the simple regression model with a single input, the -stat includes the intercept term. Otherwise, it does not. See Lecture 5 for more detail. ↩︎